It has been argued that the existence of any dualistic system leads necessarily to a condition of conflict. This paper supports that this notion is false. In contrast, conflict in a system of dualism is the imperative result only in the case that one of the two poles of dualism recognizes the other as an enemy and aims to dominate it following a clearly henistic approach.This paper investigates such approaches into three different types of social schemes, namely, families, cities and states.
